Matthew Prince, CEO of the internet infrastructure provider Cloudflare, tweeted that “nothing we’re seeing related to the Facebook services outage suggests it was an attack.” Prince said the most likely explanation was that Facebook mistakenly knocked itself off the internet during maintenance.įacebook did not respond to messages for comment about the attack or the possibility of malicious activity. There was no evidence as of Monday afternoon that malicious activity was involved. He blamed “networking issues” and said teams are “working as fast as possible to debug and restore as fast as possible.” Mike Schroepfer, Facebook’s outgoing chief technology officer, later tweeted “sincere apologies” to everyone impacted by the outage. Regarding the internal failures, Instagram head Adam Mosseri tweeted that it feels like a “snow day.” FACEBOOK INC. WHATSAPP INC. SOFTWAREThe stricken content-delivery company in that case, Fastly, blamed it on a software bug triggered by a customer who changed a setting.įor hours, Facebook’s only public comment was a tweet in which it acknowledged that “some people are having trouble accessing (the) Facebook app” and said it was working on restoring access. FACEBOOK INC. WHATSAPP INC. OFFLINEThe last major internet outage, which knocked many of the world’s top websites offline in June, lasted less than an hour. In Italy, in May 2017, the Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) fined WhatsApp EUR 3 million for having forced its users to share their personal data with Facebook as a conclusion of two investigations opened in October 2016 concerning infringements of the Consumer Code.“This is epic,” said Doug Madory, director of internet analysis for Kentik Inc, a network monitoring and intelligence company. In Germany, the Bundeskartellamt initiated in March 2016 a proceeding against Facebook – Facebook Inc., USA, the Irish subsidiary of the company, and Facebook Germany GmbH, Hamburg – on suspicion that Facebook had abused its market power by infringing data protection rules with its specific terms of service on the use of user data. Notwithstanding, just some months after the decision two national competition authorities (Germany and Italy) opened procedures against Facebook. Privacy-related concerns from the increased concentration of data within the control of Facebook because of the deal with WhatsApp are not an EU Competition Law matter. The EC analysed potential data concentration issues only within the scope that the acquisition could weigh down competition in the online advertising market. In its decision, the EC stated that the deal would raise no competition concerns and authorised the proposed acquisition of WhatsApp by Facebook concluding that Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp are not close competitors and that consumers would continue to have a wide choice of alternatives for consumer communication apps after the acquisition. (“WhatsApp”, USA) by way of a purchase of shares for US$ 19 billion, which contributed to Facebook’s strategy of focusing its business on mobile development (Case no. (“Facebook”, USA) had acquired WhatsApp Inc. On October 3rd, 2014, the European Commission (EC) concluded the analysis of the transaction by which Facebook, Inc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |